| | | | | | |

Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Core i7-4702MQ


Description
The Q9550 is based on Core architecture while the i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q9550 gets a score of 49 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 75.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4702MQ is 1.5 times faster than the Q9550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
306c3
Core
Yorkfield
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.833 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.833 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket G3
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /8
TDP
95 W
37 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128+128 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
12288 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
March 2008
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
17.29k points
36.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.98k points
145.15k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
Q9550
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2.6k
3.45k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
6.67k
8.53k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.72k
3.99k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.43k
3.51k (x0.79)
TOTAL
16.42k
19.47k (x1.19)

Multithread

Q9550

i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
9.92k
11.93k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
25.37k
42.4k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.31k
18k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.37k
3.6k (x1.07)
TOTAL
48.96k
75.92k (x1.55)

Performance/W
Q9550
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
104 points/W
323 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
267 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109 points/W
486 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
97 points/W
TOTAL
515 points/W
2052 points/W

Performance/GHz
Q9550
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
917 points/GHz
1078 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2356 points/GHz
2665 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
959 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1565 points/GHz
1096 points/GHz
TOTAL
5797 points/GHz
6085 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4