| | | | | | |

Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Core i5-7500


Description
The Q9550 is based on Core architecture while the i5-7500 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q9550 gets a score of 49 k points while the i5-7500 gets 154.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7500 is 3.2 times faster than the Q9550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
906e9
Core
Yorkfield
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.833 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.833 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128+128 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
12288 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2008
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
17.29k points
61.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.98k points
191.71k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
Q9550
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
2.6k
3.87k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
6.67k
16.09k (x2.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.72k
5.11k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.43k
7.97k (x1.8)
TOTAL
16.42k
33.04k (x2.01)

Multithread

Q9550

i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
9.92k
14.81k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
25.37k
61.51k (x2.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.31k
19.59k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.37k
3.68k (x1.09)
TOTAL
48.96k
99.59k (x2.03)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q9550
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
3.28k
14.09k (x4.29)
Test#2 (FP)
7.28k
19.8k (x2.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
5.34k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
8.45k (x2.17)
TOTAL
17.29k
47.67k (x2.76)

Multithread

Q9550

i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
11.72k
53.99k (x4.61)
Test#2 (FP)
24.91k
77.43k (x3.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.77k
20.81k (x2.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
2.53k (x0.99)
TOTAL
48.98k
154.77k (x3.16)

Performance/W
Q9550
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
123 points/W
831 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
262 points/W
1191 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103 points/W
320 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
516 points/W
2381 points/W

Performance/GHz
Q9550
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2568 points/GHz
5210 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
1406 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1375 points/GHz
2222 points/GHz
TOTAL
6103 points/GHz
12546 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4