| | | | | | |

Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Celeron N4020


Description
The Q9550 is based on Core architecture while the N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q9550 gets a score of 49 k points while the N4020 gets 26.9 k points.

Summarizing, the Q9550 is 1.8 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
706a8
Core
Yorkfield
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.833 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.833 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
95 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128+128 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2008
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
17.29k points
17.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.98k points
26.91k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
Q9550
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
2.6k
1.25k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
6.67k
5.19k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.72k
2.56k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.43k
1.61k (x0.36)
TOTAL
16.42k
10.61k (x0.65)

Multithread

Q9550

N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
9.92k
1.68k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
25.37k
7.29k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.31k
3.51k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.37k
1.29k (x0.38)
TOTAL
48.96k
13.78k (x0.28)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q9550
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
3.28k
5.25k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
7.28k
7.92k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
2.94k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
1.77k (x0.45)
TOTAL
17.29k
17.88k (x1.03)

Multithread

Q9550

N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
11.72k
8.01k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
24.91k
12.56k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.77k
4.55k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
1.78k (x0.69)
TOTAL
48.98k
26.91k (x0.55)

Performance/W
Q9550
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
123 points/W
1336 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
262 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103 points/W
758 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
297 points/W
TOTAL
516 points/W
4484 points/W

Performance/GHz
Q9550
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/GHz
1875 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2568 points/GHz
2828 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
1050 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1375 points/GHz
631 points/GHz
TOTAL
6103 points/GHz
6384 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4