| | | | | | |

Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Celeron J4105


Description
The Q9550 is based on Core architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q9550 gets a score of 49 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.3 times faster than the Q9550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
706a1
Core
Yorkfield
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.833 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.833 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
95 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128+128 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2008
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
17.29k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.98k points
61.49k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
Q9550
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2.6k
1.68k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
6.67k
5.29k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.72k
2.75k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.43k
3.44k (x0.78)
TOTAL
16.42k
13.16k (x0.8)

Multithread

Q9550

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
9.92k
6.39k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
25.37k
20.02k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.31k
10.22k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.37k
4.94k (x1.47)
TOTAL
48.96k
41.57k (x0.85)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q9550
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
3.28k
4.9k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
7.28k
7.26k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.83k
2.75k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
3.32k (x0.85)
TOTAL
17.29k
18.22k (x1.05)

Multithread

Q9550

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
11.72k
18.84k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
24.91k
27.45k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.77k
10.35k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
4.85k (x1.89)
TOTAL
48.98k
61.49k (x1.26)

Performance/W
Q9550
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
123 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
262 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
103 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
516 points/W
6149 points/W

Performance/GHz
Q9550
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
1159 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2568 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1001 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1375 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
6103 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4