Core 2 Quad Q8400 vs Pentium E5200 (M0)
Description
Both models Q8400 and E5200 (M0) are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q8400 gets a score of 51.9 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the Q8400 is 2.4 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q8400 gets a score of 51.9 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the Q8400 is 2.4 times faster than the E5200 (M0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
10676
Core
Yorkfield
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.666 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128+128 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2048 kB
Date
April 2009
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
14.04k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
51.92k points
22.02k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q8400
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
3.08k
2.88k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
6.8k
6.31k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.73k
2.53k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.42k
1.35k (x0.95)
TOTAL
14.04k
13.08k (x0.93)
Multithread
Q8400
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
12.25k
5.45k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
26.84k
11.5k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
4.02k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.02k
1.05k (x0.52)
TOTAL
51.92k
22.02k (x0.42)
Performance/W
Q8400
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
129 points/W
84 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
283 points/W
177 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
21 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
547 points/W
339 points/W
Performance/GHz
Q8400
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
1154 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2551 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1025 points/GHz
1013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
532 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
5265 points/GHz
5231 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4