| | | | | | |

Core 2 Quad Q8400 vs Core i5-10400T


Description
The Q8400 is based on Core architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q8400 gets a score of 51.9 k points while the i5-10400T gets 229.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 4.4 times faster than the Q8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
a0653
Core
Yorkfield
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.666 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.666 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128+128 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2009
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
14.04k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
51.92k points
307.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
Q8400
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.44k
4k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
6.24k
14.19k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.62k
4.62k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.43k
11.03k (x7.73)
TOTAL
12.73k
33.84k (x2.66)

Multithread

Q8400

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
9.71k
22.77k (x2.34)
Test#2 (FP)
24.81k
96.59k (x3.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
31.65k (x3.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.03k
2.45k (x1.21)
TOTAL
47.05k
153.46k (x3.26)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q8400
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.08k
12.61k (x4.09)
Test#2 (FP)
6.8k
17.94k (x2.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.73k
4.83k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.42k
10.81k (x7.63)
TOTAL
14.04k
46.19k (x3.29)

Multithread

Q8400

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.25k
74.62k (x6.09)
Test#2 (FP)
26.84k
119.63k (x4.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
32.65k (x3.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.02k
2.52k (x1.25)
TOTAL
51.92k
229.42k (x4.42)

Performance/W
Q8400
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
129 points/W
2132 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
283 points/W
3418 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114 points/W
933 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
21 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
547 points/W
6555 points/W

Performance/GHz
Q8400
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
3503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2551 points/GHz
4984 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1025 points/GHz
1341 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
532 points/GHz
3003 points/GHz
TOTAL
5265 points/GHz
12831 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4