| | | | | | |

Core 2 Quad Q8400 vs Celeron J4105


Description
The Q8400 is based on Core architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q8400 gets a score of 51.9 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.2 times faster than the Q8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
706a1
Core
Yorkfield
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.666 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.666 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
95 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
128+128 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2009
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
14.04k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
51.92k points
61.49k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
Q8400
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2.44k
1.68k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
6.24k
5.29k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.62k
2.75k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.43k
3.44k (x2.41)
TOTAL
12.73k
13.16k (x1.03)

Multithread

Q8400

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
9.71k
6.39k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
24.81k
20.02k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.51k
10.22k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.03k
4.94k (x2.44)
TOTAL
47.05k
41.57k (x0.88)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q8400
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
3.08k
4.9k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
6.8k
7.26k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.73k
2.75k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.42k
3.32k (x2.34)
TOTAL
14.04k
18.22k (x1.3)

Multithread

Q8400

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
12.25k
18.84k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
26.84k
27.45k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.82k
10.35k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.02k
4.85k (x2.41)
TOTAL
51.92k
61.49k (x1.18)

Performance/W
Q8400
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
129 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
283 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
21 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
547 points/W
6149 points/W

Performance/GHz
Q8400
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2551 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1025 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
532 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
5265 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4