Core 2 Quad Q6700 vs Xeon E5504
Description
The Q6700 is based on Core architecture while the E5504 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6700 gets a score of 19.8 k points while the E5504 gets 42 k points.
Summarizing, the E5504 is 2.1 times faster than the Q6700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6700 gets a score of 19.8 k points while the E5504 gets 42 k points.
Summarizing, the E5504 is 2.1 times faster than the Q6700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fb
106a5
Core
Kentsfield
Gainestown
Base frecuency
2.666 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
4 /4
TDP
95 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
8192 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2007
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
10.05k points
10.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
19.77k points
41.95k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q6700
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
3.06k
4.57k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
2.74k
3.07k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.56k
1.85k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.68k
1.43k (x0.85)
TOTAL
10.05k
10.92k (x1.09)
Multithread
Q6700
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
7.28k
19.07k (x2.62)
Test#2 (FP)
5.83k
12.52k (x2.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.13k
7.97k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.53k
2.39k (x1.56)
TOTAL
19.77k
41.95k (x2.12)
Performance/W
Q6700
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
77 points/W
238 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
61 points/W
157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54 points/W
100 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
208 points/W
524 points/W
Performance/GHz
Q6700
E5504
Test#1 (Integers)
1146 points/GHz
2287 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1029 points/GHz
1535 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
962 points/GHz
926 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
632 points/GHz
713 points/GHz
TOTAL
3768 points/GHz
5460 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4