Core 2 Quad Q6700 vs Celeron N3150
Description
The Q6700 is based on Core architecture while the N3150 is based on Airmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6700 gets a score of 19.8 k points while the N3150 gets 31.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N3150 is 1.6 times faster than the Q6700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6700 gets a score of 19.8 k points while the N3150 gets 31.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N3150 is 1.6 times faster than the Q6700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fb
406c3
Core
Kentsfield
Braswell
Base frecuency
2.666 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.666 GHz
2.08 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
95 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
8192 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
kB
Date
April 2007
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
10.05k points
9.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
19.77k points
31.8k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q6700
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
3.06k
3.91k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
2.74k
2.29k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.56k
1.57k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.68k
1.44k (x0.86)
TOTAL
10.05k
9.21k (x0.92)
Multithread
Q6700
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
7.28k
14.78k (x2.03)
Test#2 (FP)
5.83k
8.62k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.13k
5.84k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.53k
2.57k (x1.67)
TOTAL
19.77k
31.8k (x1.61)
Performance/W
Q6700
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
77 points/W
2463 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
61 points/W
1437 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54 points/W
973 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
428 points/W
TOTAL
208 points/W
5300 points/W
Performance/GHz
Q6700
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
1146 points/GHz
1880 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1029 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
962 points/GHz
755 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
632 points/GHz
692 points/GHz
TOTAL
3768 points/GHz
4429 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4