Core 2 Quad Q6700 vs Celeron J1900
Description
The Q6700 is based on Core architecture while the J1900 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6700 gets a score of 19.8 k points while the J1900 gets 33.2 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 1.7 times faster than the Q6700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6700 gets a score of 19.8 k points while the J1900 gets 33.2 k points.
Summarizing, the J1900 is 1.7 times faster than the Q6700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fb
30679
Core
Kentsfield
Bay Trail-D
Base frecuency
2.666 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.666 GHz
2.42 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
95 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
8192 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
April 2007
November 2013
Mean monothread perf.
10.05k points
9.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
19.77k points
33.25k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q6700
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
3.06k
4.58k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
2.74k
2.32k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.56k
1.72k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.68k
1.14k (x0.67)
TOTAL
10.05k
9.75k (x0.97)
Multithread
Q6700
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
7.28k
17.16k (x2.36)
Test#2 (FP)
5.83k
8.42k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.13k
6.22k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.53k
1.44k (x0.94)
TOTAL
19.77k
33.25k (x1.68)
Performance/W
Q6700
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
77 points/W
1716 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
61 points/W
842 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54 points/W
622 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
208 points/W
3325 points/W
Performance/GHz
Q6700
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
1146 points/GHz
1893 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1029 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
962 points/GHz
709 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
632 points/GHz
470 points/GHz
TOTAL
3768 points/GHz
4029 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4