Core 2 Quad Q6700 vs E Series E-450
Description
The Q6700 is based on Core architecture while the E-450 is based on Bobcat.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6700 gets a score of 19.8 k points while the E-450 gets 9.7 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6700 is 2 times faster than the E-450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6700 gets a score of 19.8 k points while the E-450 gets 9.7 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6700 is 2 times faster than the E-450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fb
500f20
Core
Kentsfield
Zacate
Base frecuency
2.666 GHz
1.65 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket FT1
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
95 W
18 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
8192 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
April 2007
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
10.05k points
6.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
19.77k points
9.65k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q6700
E-450
Test#1 (Integers)
3.06k
1.82k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
2.74k
2.57k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.56k
1.46k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.68k
0.66k (x0.39)
TOTAL
10.05k
6.51k (x0.65)
Multithread
Q6700
E-450
Test#1 (Integers)
7.28k
3.16k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
5.83k
4.19k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.13k
1.73k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.53k
0.58k (x0.38)
TOTAL
19.77k
9.65k (x0.49)
Performance/W
Q6700
E-450
Test#1 (Integers)
77 points/W
176 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
61 points/W
233 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54 points/W
96 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
16 points/W
32 points/W
TOTAL
208 points/W
536 points/W
Performance/GHz
Q6700
E-450
Test#1 (Integers)
1146 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1029 points/GHz
1557 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
962 points/GHz
883 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
632 points/GHz
401 points/GHz
TOTAL
3768 points/GHz
3947 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4