Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Xeon X3430
Description
The Q6600 is based on Core architecture while the X3430 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6600 gets a score of 30.6 k points while the X3430 gets 55.7 k points.
Summarizing, the X3430 is 1.8 times faster than the Q6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6600 gets a score of 30.6 k points while the X3430 gets 55.7 k points.
Summarizing, the X3430 is 1.8 times faster than the Q6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fb
106e5
Core
Kentsfield
Lynnfield
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA1156
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8192 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2007
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
8.92k points
15.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
30.64k points
55.66k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q6600
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
2.78k
6.41k (x2.31)
Test#2 (FP)
2.49k
4.27k (x1.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
2.38k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.29k
2.67k (x2.07)
TOTAL
8.92k
15.74k (x1.76)
Multithread
Q6600
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
10.9k
25.19k (x2.31)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
16.76k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.11k
9.33k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
4.37k (x5.2)
TOTAL
30.64k
55.66k (x1.82)
Performance/W
Q6600
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
115 points/W
265 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
103 points/W
176 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96 points/W
98 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
9 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
323 points/W
586 points/W
Performance/GHz
Q6600
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
2288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1036 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
852 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
954 points/GHz
TOTAL
3718 points/GHz
5621 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4