Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Pentium 4417U
Description
The Q6600 is based on Core architecture while the 4417U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6600 gets a score of 30.6 k points while the 4417U gets 41.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4417U is 1.3 times faster than the Q6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6600 gets a score of 30.6 k points while the 4417U gets 41.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 4417U is 1.3 times faster than the Q6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fb
806ea
Core
Kentsfield
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8192 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
2048 kB
Date
July 2007
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
8.92k points
24.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
30.64k points
41.15k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q6600
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.78k
7.94k (x2.86)
Test#2 (FP)
2.49k
11.35k (x4.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
2.39k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.29k
2.8k (x2.16)
TOTAL
8.92k
24.49k (x2.74)
Multithread
Q6600
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.9k
13.1k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
21.1k (x2.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.11k
4.49k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
2.46k (x2.93)
TOTAL
30.64k
41.15k (x1.34)
Performance/W
Q6600
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
115 points/W
873 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
103 points/W
1407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
9 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
323 points/W
2743 points/W
Performance/GHz
Q6600
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
3452 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1036 points/GHz
4937 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
1041 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
1217 points/GHz
TOTAL
3718 points/GHz
10646 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4