Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Core 2 Duo T7250
Description
Both models Q6600 and T7250 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6600 gets a score of 30.6 k points while the T7250 gets 13.8 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 2.2 times faster than the T7250 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6600 gets a score of 30.6 k points while the T7250 gets 13.8 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 2.2 times faster than the T7250 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fb
6fd
Core
Kentsfield
Merom
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket P
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8192 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
July 2007
September 2007
Mean monothread perf.
8.92k points
7.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
30.64k points
13.82k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q6600
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
2.78k
2.27k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
2.49k
2.07k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
2.01k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.29k
1.22k (x0.94)
TOTAL
8.92k
7.57k (x0.85)
Multithread
Q6600
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
10.9k
4.51k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
4.09k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.11k
3.9k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
1.32k (x1.57)
TOTAL
30.64k
13.82k (x0.45)
Performance/W
Q6600
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
115 points/W
129 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
103 points/W
117 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96 points/W
111 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
9 points/W
38 points/W
TOTAL
323 points/W
395 points/W
Performance/GHz
Q6600
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
1135 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1036 points/GHz
1036 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
611 points/GHz
TOTAL
3718 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4