| | | | | | |

Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Core 2 Duo E6600


Description
Both models Q6600 and E6600 are based on Core architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6600 gets a score of 30.6 k points while the E6600 gets 16.1 k points.

Summarizing, the Q6600 is 1.9 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
6fb
6f6
Core
Kentsfield
Conroe
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8192 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
July 2007
July 2006
Mean monothread perf.
8.92k points
9.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
30.64k points
16.12k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q6600
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
2.78k
2.7k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
2.49k
2.42k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
2.41k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.29k
2.46k (x1.9)
TOTAL
8.92k
9.99k (x1.12)

Multithread

Q6600

E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
10.9k
5.19k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
4.55k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.11k
4.6k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
1.78k (x2.12)
TOTAL
30.64k
16.12k (x0.53)

Performance/W
Q6600
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
115 points/W
80 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
103 points/W
70 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96 points/W
71 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
9 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
323 points/W
248 points/W

Performance/GHz
Q6600
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
1125 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1036 points/GHz
1009 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
1025 points/GHz
TOTAL
3718 points/GHz
4164 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4