Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Celeron N4020
Description
The Q6600 is based on Core architecture while the N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6600 gets a score of 30.6 k points while the N4020 gets 25.3 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 1.2 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6600 gets a score of 30.6 k points while the N4020 gets 25.3 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 1.2 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fb
706a8
Core
Kentsfield
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
95 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
8192 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
July 2007
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
8.92k points
17.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
30.64k points
25.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q6600
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
2.78k
5.14k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
2.49k
7.89k (x3.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
2.87k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.29k
1.76k (x1.36)
TOTAL
8.92k
17.67k (x1.98)
Multithread
Q6600
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
10.9k
7.46k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
11.61k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.11k
4.27k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
1.91k (x2.28)
TOTAL
30.64k
25.26k (x0.82)
Performance/W
Q6600
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
115 points/W
1244 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
103 points/W
1936 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96 points/W
712 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
9 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
323 points/W
4211 points/W
Performance/GHz
Q6600
N4020
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
1837 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1036 points/GHz
2816 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
1026 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
630 points/GHz
TOTAL
3718 points/GHz
6309 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4