Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The Q6600 is based on Core architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6600 gets a score of 30.6 k points while the 2200U gets 64.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 2.1 times faster than the Q6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6600 gets a score of 30.6 k points while the 2200U gets 64.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2200U is 2.1 times faster than the Q6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fb
810f10
Core
Kentsfield
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8192 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2007
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
8.92k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
30.64k points
71.02k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q6600
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.78k
11.67k (x4.2)
Test#2 (FP)
2.49k
14.02k (x5.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
4.53k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.29k
2.93k (x2.26)
TOTAL
8.92k
33.14k (x3.71)
Multithread
Q6600
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.9k
20.49k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
31.32k (x3.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.11k
9.99k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
3.03k (x3.61)
TOTAL
30.64k
64.82k (x2.12)
Performance/W
Q6600
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
115 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
103 points/W
2088 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96 points/W
666 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
9 points/W
202 points/W
TOTAL
323 points/W
4322 points/W
Performance/GHz
Q6600
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
3433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1036 points/GHz
4123 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
1331 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
861 points/GHz
TOTAL
3718 points/GHz
9748 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4