Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs E Series E-350
Description
The Q6600 is based on Core architecture while the E-350 is based on Bobcat.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6600 gets a score of 30.6 k points while the E-350 gets 10 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 3.1 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6600 gets a score of 30.6 k points while the E-350 gets 10 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 3.1 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fb
500f10
Core
Kentsfield
Zacate
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket FT1
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
95 W
18 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
8192 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
July 2007
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
8.92k points
6.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
30.64k points
10.05k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q6600
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
2.78k
1.78k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
2.49k
2.33k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
1.41k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.29k
0.74k (x0.58)
TOTAL
8.92k
6.26k (x0.7)
Multithread
Q6600
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
10.9k
2.84k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
3.89k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.11k
2.42k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
0.9k (x1.07)
TOTAL
30.64k
10.05k (x0.33)
Performance/W
Q6600
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
115 points/W
158 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
103 points/W
216 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96 points/W
134 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
9 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
323 points/W
558 points/W
Performance/GHz
Q6600
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1036 points/GHz
1454 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
879 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
465 points/GHz
TOTAL
3718 points/GHz
3914 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4