Core 2 Quad Q6600 vs C Series C-60
Description
The Q6600 is based on Core architecture while the C-60 is based on Bobcat.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6600 gets a score of 30.6 k points while the C-60 gets 8.5 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 3.6 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Q6600 gets a score of 30.6 k points while the C-60 gets 8.5 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 3.6 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fb
500f20
Core
Kentsfield
Ontario
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.33 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket FT1
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
95 W
9 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
8192 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
July 2007
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
8.92k points
4.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
30.64k points
8.53k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
Q6600
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
2.78k
1.32k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
2.49k
1.94k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
1.07k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.29k
0.45k (x0.35)
TOTAL
8.92k
4.79k (x0.54)
Multithread
Q6600
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
10.9k
2.36k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
3.52k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.11k
1.92k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
0.73k (x0.87)
TOTAL
30.64k
8.53k (x0.28)
Performance/W
Q6600
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
115 points/W
262 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
103 points/W
391 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96 points/W
213 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
9 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
323 points/W
948 points/W
Performance/GHz
Q6600
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1036 points/GHz
1461 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
986 points/GHz
802 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
539 points/GHz
342 points/GHz
TOTAL
3718 points/GHz
3599 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4