| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo T7250 vs Pentium N3540


Description
The T7250 is based on Core architecture while the N3540 is based on Silvermont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7250 gets a score of 13.8 k points while the N3540 gets 37.5 k points.

Summarizing, the N3540 is 2.7 times faster than the T7250 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
6fd
30678
Core
Merom
Bay Trail-M
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
Socket P
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
September 2007
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
7.57k points
10.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.82k points
37.5k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
T7250
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
1.96k
1.37k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
2k
2k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.96k
1.95k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.22k
1.21k (x0.99)
TOTAL
7.14k
6.53k (x0.91)

Multithread

T7250

N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
5.24k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
3.95k
7.69k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.8k
7.31k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.34k
1.52k (x1.13)
TOTAL
12.96k
21.76k (x1.68)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T7250
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
2.27k
4.97k (x2.19)
Test#2 (FP)
2.07k
2.58k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
1.98k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.22k
1.2k (x0.98)
TOTAL
7.57k
10.72k (x1.42)

Multithread

T7250

N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
4.51k
18.92k (x4.19)
Test#2 (FP)
4.09k
9.67k (x2.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
7.37k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.32k
1.54k (x1.17)
TOTAL
13.82k
37.5k (x2.71)

Performance/W
T7250
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
129 points/W
2703 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
117 points/W
1382 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111 points/W
1053 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
38 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
395 points/W
5357 points/W

Performance/GHz
T7250
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
1135 points/GHz
1864 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1036 points/GHz
967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
741 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
611 points/GHz
448 points/GHz
TOTAL
3787 points/GHz
4020 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4