Core 2 Duo T7250 vs E6550
Description
Both models T7250 and E6550 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7250 gets a score of 13.8 k points while the E6550 gets 16.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E6550 is 1.2 times faster than the T7250 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7250 gets a score of 13.8 k points while the E6550 gets 16.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E6550 is 1.2 times faster than the T7250 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
6fb
Core
Merom
Conroe
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.333 GHz
Socket
Socket P
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2007
July 2007
Mean monothread perf.
7.57k points
10.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.82k points
16.38k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
T7250
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
1.96k
2.34k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
2k
2.34k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.96k
2.35k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.22k
2.72k (x2.22)
TOTAL
7.14k
9.75k (x1.36)
Multithread
T7250
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
4.67k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
3.95k
4.68k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.8k
4.71k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.34k
1.26k (x0.94)
TOTAL
12.96k
15.32k (x1.18)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T7250
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
2.27k
2.7k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
2.07k
2.43k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
2.44k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.22k
2.74k (x2.24)
TOTAL
7.57k
10.31k (x1.36)
Multithread
T7250
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
4.51k
5.39k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
4.09k
4.85k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
4.89k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.32k
1.26k (x0.95)
TOTAL
13.82k
16.38k (x1.19)
Performance/W
T7250
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
129 points/W
83 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
117 points/W
75 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111 points/W
75 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
38 points/W
19 points/W
TOTAL
395 points/W
252 points/W
Performance/GHz
T7250
E6550
Test#1 (Integers)
1135 points/GHz
1156 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1036 points/GHz
1041 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
1047 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
611 points/GHz
1173 points/GHz
TOTAL
3787 points/GHz
4417 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4