| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo T7250 vs Core i3-6006U


Description
The T7250 is based on Core architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7250 gets a score of 13.8 k points while the i3-6006U gets 47.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 3.4 times faster than the T7250 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
6fd
406e3
Core
Merom
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket P
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2007
November 2016
Mean monothread perf.
7.57k points
31.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.82k points
68.38k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
T7250
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
1.96k
2.02k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
2k
8.2k (x4.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.96k
2.63k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.22k
3.92k (x3.2)
TOTAL
7.14k
16.77k (x2.35)

Multithread

T7250

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
3.83k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
3.95k
17.17k (x4.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.8k
5.77k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.34k
3.62k (x2.7)
TOTAL
12.96k
30.39k (x2.34)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T7250
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.27k
7.28k (x3.21)
Test#2 (FP)
2.07k
10.51k (x5.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
2.81k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.22k
2.88k (x2.36)
TOTAL
7.57k
23.48k (x3.1)

Multithread

T7250

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.51k
14.98k (x3.32)
Test#2 (FP)
4.09k
23.68k (x5.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
6.37k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.32k
2.43k (x1.85)
TOTAL
13.82k
47.46k (x3.43)

Performance/W
T7250
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
129 points/W
998 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
117 points/W
1579 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111 points/W
425 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
38 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
395 points/W
3164 points/W

Performance/GHz
T7250
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
1135 points/GHz
3640 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1036 points/GHz
5255 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
611 points/GHz
1441 points/GHz
TOTAL
3787 points/GHz
11739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4