Core 2 Duo T7250 vs Celeron N3450
Description
The T7250 is based on Core architecture while the N3450 is based on Goldmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7250 gets a score of 13.8 k points while the N3450 gets 39.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N3450 is 2.8 times faster than the T7250 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7250 gets a score of 13.8 k points while the N3450 gets 39.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N3450 is 2.8 times faster than the T7250 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
506c9
Core
Merom
Apollo Lake
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
Socket P
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
September 2007
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
7.57k points
13.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
13.82k points
39.33k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
T7250
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
1.96k
1.54k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
2k
2.86k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.96k
1.88k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.22k
1.78k (x1.46)
TOTAL
7.14k
8.06k (x1.13)
Multithread
T7250
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
5.91k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
3.95k
8.55k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.8k
5.48k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.34k
2.98k (x2.22)
TOTAL
12.96k
22.92k (x1.77)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T7250
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
2.27k
5.95k (x2.62)
Test#2 (FP)
2.07k
3.45k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.01k
1.92k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.22k
1.78k (x1.46)
TOTAL
7.57k
13.11k (x1.73)
Multithread
T7250
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
4.51k
21.38k (x4.74)
Test#2 (FP)
4.09k
9.84k (x2.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
5.25k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.32k
2.86k (x2.17)
TOTAL
13.82k
39.33k (x2.85)
Performance/W
T7250
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
129 points/W
3564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
117 points/W
1640 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
111 points/W
875 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
38 points/W
477 points/W
TOTAL
395 points/W
6555 points/W
Performance/GHz
T7250
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
1135 points/GHz
2706 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1036 points/GHz
1570 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1005 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
611 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
3787 points/GHz
5959 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4