Core 2 Duo T7100 vs Pentium E5200 (R0)
Description
Both models T7100 and E5200 (R0) are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the E5200 (R0) gets 24.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (R0) is 1.9 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the E5200 (R0) gets 24.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (R0) is 1.9 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
1067a
Core
Merom
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket P
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2048 kB
Date
May 2007
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
7.05k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.9k points
24.89k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T7100
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
2.08k
2.87k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
1.86k
6.42k (x3.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
2.58k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.25k
1.21k (x0.97)
TOTAL
7.05k
13.08k (x1.86)
Multithread
T7100
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
5.74k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
3.73k
12.78k (x3.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.73k
5.18k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.28k
1.2k (x0.93)
TOTAL
12.9k
24.89k (x1.93)
Performance/W
T7100
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
119 points/W
88 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
107 points/W
197 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
106 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
369 points/W
383 points/W
Performance/GHz
T7100
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1033 points/GHz
2568 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
485 points/GHz
TOTAL
3916 points/GHz
5232 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4