Core 2 Duo T7100 vs Pentium T3400
Description
Both models T7100 and T3400 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the T3400 gets 14.9 k points.
Summarizing, the T3400 is 1.2 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the T3400 gets 14.9 k points.
Summarizing, the T3400 is 1.2 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
6fd
Core
Merom
Merom-2M
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.167 GHz
Socket
Socket P
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
May 2007
October 2008
Mean monothread perf.
7.05k points
8.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.9k points
14.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T7100
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
2.08k
2.49k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
1.86k
2.25k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
2.17k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.25k
1.14k (x0.92)
TOTAL
7.05k
8.05k (x1.14)
Multithread
T7100
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
4.98k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
3.73k
4.43k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.73k
4.27k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.28k
1.23k (x0.95)
TOTAL
12.9k
14.91k (x1.16)
Performance/W
T7100
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
119 points/W
142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
107 points/W
127 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
106 points/W
122 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
369 points/W
426 points/W
Performance/GHz
T7100
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1033 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
1002 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
526 points/GHz
TOTAL
3916 points/GHz
3714 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4