Core 2 Duo T7100 vs Pentium D 950
Description
The T7100 is based on Core architecture while the 950 is based on NetBurst.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the 950 gets 7.3 k points.
Summarizing, the T7100 is 1.8 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the 950 gets 7.3 k points.
Summarizing, the T7100 is 1.8 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
f64
Core
Merom
Presler
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
Socket P
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
16+8 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2007
January 2006
Mean monothread perf.
7.05k points
8.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.9k points
7.34k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T7100
950
Test#1 (Integers)
2.08k
2.36k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
1.86k
3.74k (x2.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
1.76k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.25k
0.86k (x0.69)
TOTAL
7.05k
8.73k (x1.24)
Multithread
T7100
950
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
4.34k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
3.73k
1.91k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.73k
0.75k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.28k
0.35k (x0.27)
TOTAL
12.9k
7.34k (x0.57)
Performance/W
T7100
950
Test#1 (Integers)
119 points/W
33 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
107 points/W
15 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
106 points/W
6 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
3 points/W
TOTAL
369 points/W
56 points/W
Performance/GHz
T7100
950
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
695 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1033 points/GHz
1101 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
518 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
253 points/GHz
TOTAL
3916 points/GHz
2567 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4