Core 2 Duo T7100 vs Core i5-M 540
Description
The T7100 is based on Core architecture while the i5-M 540 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the i5-M 540 gets 29.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-M 540 is 2.3 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the i5-M 540 gets 29.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-M 540 is 2.3 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
20652
Core
Merom
Arrandale
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket P
FC-PGA10
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2007
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
7.05k points
15.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.9k points
29.54k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T7100
i5-M 540
Test#1 (Integers)
2.08k
6.7k (x3.22)
Test#2 (FP)
1.86k
4.54k (x2.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
2.48k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.25k
1.32k (x1.06)
TOTAL
7.05k
15.05k (x2.13)
Multithread
T7100
i5-M 540
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
12.27k (x2.95)
Test#2 (FP)
3.73k
9.7k (x2.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.73k
5.97k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.28k
1.59k (x1.24)
TOTAL
12.9k
29.54k (x2.29)
Performance/W
T7100
i5-M 540
Test#1 (Integers)
119 points/W
351 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
107 points/W
277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
106 points/W
171 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
369 points/W
844 points/W
Performance/GHz
T7100
i5-M 540
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
2394 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1033 points/GHz
1622 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
885 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
473 points/GHz
TOTAL
3916 points/GHz
5373 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4