Core 2 Duo T7100 vs Core Duo T2300
Description
The T7100 is based on Core architecture while the T2300 is based on P6 Enhanced Pentium M.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the T2300 gets 9.4 k points.
Summarizing, the T7100 is 1.4 times faster than the T2300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the T2300 gets 9.4 k points.
Summarizing, the T7100 is 1.4 times faster than the T2300 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
6e8
Core
Merom
Yonah
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
1.66 GHz
Socket
Socket P
Socket 479
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
31 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2048 kB
Date
May 2007
January 2006
Mean monothread perf.
7.05k points
5.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.9k points
9.38k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T7100
T2300
Test#1 (Integers)
2.08k
1.46k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
1.86k
1.63k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
1.53k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.25k
0.96k (x0.77)
TOTAL
7.05k
5.58k (x0.79)
Multithread
T7100
T2300
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
2.42k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
3.73k
2.95k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.73k
3k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.28k
1.01k (x0.79)
TOTAL
12.9k
9.38k (x0.73)
Performance/W
T7100
T2300
Test#1 (Integers)
119 points/W
78 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
107 points/W
95 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
106 points/W
97 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
369 points/W
303 points/W
Performance/GHz
T7100
T2300
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
882 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1033 points/GHz
980 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
924 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
578 points/GHz
TOTAL
3916 points/GHz
3364 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4