Core 2 Duo T7100 vs C Series C-60
Description
The T7100 is based on Core architecture while the C-60 is based on Bobcat.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the C-60 gets 8.5 k points.
Summarizing, the T7100 is 1.5 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T7100 gets a score of 12.9 k points while the C-60 gets 8.5 k points.
Summarizing, the T7100 is 1.5 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
500f20
Core
Merom
Ontario
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.8 GHz
1.33 GHz
Socket
Socket P
Socket FT1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
9 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x512 kB
Date
May 2007
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
7.05k points
4.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
12.9k points
8.53k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T7100
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
2.08k
1.32k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
1.86k
1.94k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
1.07k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.25k
0.45k (x0.37)
TOTAL
7.05k
4.79k (x0.68)
Multithread
T7100
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
4.16k
2.36k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
3.73k
3.52k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.73k
1.92k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.28k
0.73k (x0.57)
TOTAL
12.9k
8.53k (x0.66)
Performance/W
T7100
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
119 points/W
262 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
107 points/W
391 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
106 points/W
213 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
37 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
369 points/W
948 points/W
Performance/GHz
T7100
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
1157 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1033 points/GHz
1461 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1034 points/GHz
802 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
692 points/GHz
342 points/GHz
TOTAL
3916 points/GHz
3599 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4