Core 2 Duo T6600 vs Xeon X5675
Description
The T6600 is based on Core architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6600 gets a score of 20.6 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 6.1 times faster than the T6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6600 gets a score of 20.6 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the X5675 is 6.1 times faster than the T6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
206c2
Core
Penryn-3M
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
Socket P
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
6 /12
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2009
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
11.15k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
20.63k points
124.92k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T6600
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
2.55k
8.77k (x3.44)
Test#2 (FP)
5.59k
5.82k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.26k
3.47k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.75k
2.98k (x3.97)
TOTAL
11.15k
21.04k (x1.89)
Multithread
T6600
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
53.23k (x10.86)
Test#2 (FP)
10.71k
39.35k (x3.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
27.05k (x6.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.69k
5.28k (x7.68)
TOTAL
20.63k
124.92k (x6.06)
Performance/W
T6600
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
140 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
306 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
124 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
20 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
589 points/W
1315 points/W
Performance/GHz
T6600
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
1160 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2539 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
341 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
5068 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4