Core 2 Duo T6600 vs Xeon E5472
Description
Both models T6600 and E5472 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6600 gets a score of 20.6 k points while the E5472 gets 48.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5472 is 2.4 times faster than the T6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6600 gets a score of 20.6 k points while the E5472 gets 48.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5472 is 2.4 times faster than the T6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
10676
Core
Penryn-3M
Harpertown
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Socket P
LGA-771
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x6144 kB
Cache L3
kB
kB
Date
January 2009
November 2007
Mean monothread perf.
11.15k points
16.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
20.63k points
48.62k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
T6600
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
2.01k
2.29k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
5.17k
5.85k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.17k
2.44k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.75k
4.81k (x6.39)
TOTAL
10.1k
15.39k (x1.52)
Multithread
T6600
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
9.06k (x2.34)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
23.09k (x2.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.17k
9.7k (x2.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.69k
2.53k (x3.65)
TOTAL
18.58k
44.38k (x2.39)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T6600
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
2.55k
2.88k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
5.59k
6.36k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.26k
2.55k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.75k
4.83k (x6.43)
TOTAL
11.15k
16.62k (x1.49)
Multithread
T6600
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
11.19k (x2.28)
Test#2 (FP)
10.71k
24.85k (x2.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
10.04k (x2.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.69k
2.54k (x3.69)
TOTAL
20.63k
48.62k (x2.36)
Performance/W
T6600
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
140 points/W
140 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
306 points/W
311 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
124 points/W
125 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
20 points/W
32 points/W
TOTAL
589 points/W
608 points/W
Performance/GHz
T6600
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
1160 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2539 points/GHz
2119 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
341 points/GHz
1610 points/GHz
TOTAL
5068 points/GHz
5539 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4