| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo T6600 vs Core i3-6006U


Description
The T6600 is based on Core architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6600 gets a score of 20.6 k points while the i3-6006U gets 47.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 2.3 times faster than the T6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
406e3
Core
Penryn-3M
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
Socket P
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2009
November 2016
Mean monothread perf.
11.15k points
30.66k points
Mean multithread perf.
20.63k points
67.91k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
T6600
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.01k
2.02k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
5.17k
8.2k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.17k
2.63k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.75k
3.92k (x5.21)
TOTAL
10.1k
16.77k (x1.66)

Multithread

T6600

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.88k
3.83k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
17.17k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.17k
5.77k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.69k
3.62k (x5.23)
TOTAL
18.58k
30.39k (x1.64)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T6600
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.55k
7.28k (x2.85)
Test#2 (FP)
5.59k
10.51k (x1.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.26k
2.81k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.75k
2.88k (x3.84)
TOTAL
11.15k
23.48k (x2.11)

Multithread

T6600

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
14.98k (x3.06)
Test#2 (FP)
10.71k
23.68k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
6.37k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.69k
2.43k (x3.54)
TOTAL
20.63k
47.46k (x2.3)

Performance/W
T6600
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
140 points/W
998 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
306 points/W
1579 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
124 points/W
425 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
20 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
589 points/W
3164 points/W

Performance/GHz
T6600
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
1160 points/GHz
3640 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2539 points/GHz
5255 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
341 points/GHz
1441 points/GHz
TOTAL
5068 points/GHz
11739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4