Core 2 Duo T6600 vs Athlon II X2 260
Description
The T6600 is based on Core architecture while the 260 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6600 gets a score of 20.6 k points while the 260 gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 260 is 1.3 times faster than the T6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6600 gets a score of 20.6 k points while the 260 gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 260 is 1.3 times faster than the T6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
100f63
Core
Penryn-3M
Regor
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
Socket P
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
kB
Date
January 2009
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
11.15k points
17.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
20.63k points
27.54k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T6600
260
Test#1 (Integers)
2.55k
6.04k (x2.37)
Test#2 (FP)
5.59k
6.2k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.26k
3.11k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.75k
1.7k (x2.27)
TOTAL
11.15k
17.05k (x1.53)
Multithread
T6600
260
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
10.02k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
10.71k
10.18k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
5.1k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.69k
2.25k (x3.26)
TOTAL
20.63k
27.54k (x1.34)
Performance/W
T6600
260
Test#1 (Integers)
140 points/W
154 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
306 points/W
157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
124 points/W
78 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
20 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
589 points/W
424 points/W
Performance/GHz
T6600
260
Test#1 (Integers)
1160 points/GHz
1886 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2539 points/GHz
1939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
341 points/GHz
532 points/GHz
TOTAL
5068 points/GHz
5328 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4