| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo T6600 vs A6 9210


Description
The T6600 is based on Core architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6600 gets a score of 20.6 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 9210 is 1.2 times faster than the T6600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
670f00
Core
Penryn-3M
Stoney Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket P
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
January 2009
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
11.15k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
20.63k points
27.13k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T6600
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
2.55k
4.87k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
5.59k
10.38k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.26k
2.59k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.75k
2.38k (x3.17)
TOTAL
11.15k
20.22k (x1.81)

Multithread

T6600

9210
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
7.41k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
10.71k
11.87k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
3.35k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.69k
2.6k (x3.78)
TOTAL
20.63k
25.23k (x1.22)

Performance/W
T6600
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
140 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
306 points/W
792 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
124 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
20 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
589 points/W
1682 points/W

Performance/GHz
T6600
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
1160 points/GHz
1740 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2539 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1028 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
341 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
5068 points/GHz
7222 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4