Core 2 Duo T6500 vs Celeron J3455
Description
The T6500 is based on Core architecture while the J3455 is based on Goldmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6500 gets a score of 9.2 k points while the J3455 gets 47.3 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 5.1 times faster than the T6500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6500 gets a score of 9.2 k points while the J3455 gets 47.3 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 5.1 times faster than the T6500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
506c9
Core
Penryn-3M
Apollo Lake
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
FC-PGA 478
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
April 2009
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
10.9k points
12.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
9.17k points
47.34k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T6500
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
2.41k
6.02k (x2.5)
Test#2 (FP)
5.31k
3.49k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.04k
2.01k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
1.47k (x1.29)
TOTAL
10.9k
12.98k (x1.19)
Multithread
T6500
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
1.81k
23.7k (x13.06)
Test#2 (FP)
4.55k
13.75k (x3.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.58k
7.8k (x4.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.23k
2.09k (x1.7)
TOTAL
9.17k
47.34k (x5.16)
Performance/W
T6500
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
52 points/W
2370 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
130 points/W
1375 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45 points/W
780 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
262 points/W
4734 points/W
Performance/GHz
T6500
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
1148 points/GHz
2619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2530 points/GHz
1517 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
972 points/GHz
872 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
542 points/GHz
637 points/GHz
TOTAL
5192 points/GHz
5645 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4