Core 2 Duo T6400 vs Pentium E5500
Description
Both models T6400 and E5500 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6400 gets a score of 16.6 k points while the E5500 gets 20.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5500 is 1.2 times faster than the T6400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6400 gets a score of 16.6 k points while the E5500 gets 20.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5500 is 1.2 times faster than the T6400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
1067a
Core
Penryn-3M
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
FC-PGA
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2009
April 2010
Mean monothread perf.
10.08k points
12.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.08k points
20.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
T6400
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
1.76k
2.56k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
4.63k
6.54k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
2.76k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
1k
0.91k (x0.91)
TOTAL
9.24k
12.77k (x1.38)
Multithread
T6400
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
3.21k
4.32k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
8.75k
10.8k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
4.7k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
0.87k (x0.76)
TOTAL
16.58k
20.69k (x1.25)
Performance/W
T6400
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
92 points/W
66 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
250 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
99 points/W
72 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
13 points/W
TOTAL
474 points/W
318 points/W
Performance/GHz
T6400
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
880 points/GHz
914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2314 points/GHz
2335 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
928 points/GHz
985 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
499 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
4621 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4