Core 2 Duo T6400 vs Xeon W3530
Description
The T6400 is based on Core architecture while the W3530 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6400 gets a score of 17.1 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the W3530 is 4.3 times faster than the T6400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6400 gets a score of 17.1 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the W3530 is 4.3 times faster than the T6400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
106a5
Core
Penryn-3M
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
FC-PGA
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
4 /4
TDP
35 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2009
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
10.08k points
18.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.08k points
72.77k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T6400
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
2.26k
7.51k (x3.33)
Test#2 (FP)
4.98k
4.93k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.89k
3.02k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.96k
2.74k (x2.86)
TOTAL
10.08k
18.2k (x1.81)
Multithread
T6400
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
4.06k
31.33k (x7.71)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
23.11k (x2.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.38k
15.78k (x4.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.11k
2.55k (x2.29)
TOTAL
17.08k
72.77k (x4.26)
Performance/W
T6400
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
116 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
244 points/W
178 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
20 points/W
TOTAL
488 points/W
560 points/W
Performance/GHz
T6400
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
1128 points/GHz
2450 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2491 points/GHz
1608 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
944 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
478 points/GHz
892 points/GHz
TOTAL
5040 points/GHz
5935 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4