Core 2 Duo T6400 vs Xeon E5502
Description
The T6400 is based on Core architecture while the E5502 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6400 gets a score of 17.1 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5502 is 1.3 times faster than the T6400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6400 gets a score of 17.1 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5502 is 1.3 times faster than the T6400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
106a5
Core
Penryn-3M
Gainestown
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.867 GHz
Socket
FC-PGA
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
2 /2
TDP
35 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2009
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
10.08k points
11.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.08k points
22.28k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T6400
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
2.26k
4.76k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
4.98k
3.15k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.89k
1.94k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.96k
1.45k (x1.52)
TOTAL
10.08k
11.3k (x1.12)
Multithread
T6400
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
4.06k
9.48k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
6.3k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.38k
3.86k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.11k
2.64k (x2.37)
TOTAL
17.08k
22.28k (x1.3)
Performance/W
T6400
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
116 points/W
118 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
244 points/W
79 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96 points/W
48 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
488 points/W
278 points/W
Performance/GHz
T6400
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
1128 points/GHz
2549 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2491 points/GHz
1685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
944 points/GHz
1038 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
478 points/GHz
779 points/GHz
TOTAL
5040 points/GHz
6051 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4