Core 2 Duo T6400 vs T7100
Description
Both models T6400 and T7100 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6400 gets a score of 17.1 k points while the T7100 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the T6400 is 1.3 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6400 gets a score of 17.1 k points while the T7100 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the T6400 is 1.3 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
6fd
Core
Penryn-3M
Merom
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
FC-PGA
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2009
May 2007
Mean monothread perf.
10.08k points
7.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.08k points
12.9k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T6400
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
2.26k
2.08k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
4.98k
1.86k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.89k
1.86k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.96k
1.25k (x1.3)
TOTAL
10.08k
7.05k (x0.7)
Multithread
T6400
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
4.06k
4.16k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
3.73k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.38k
3.73k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.11k
1.28k (x1.15)
TOTAL
17.08k
12.9k (x0.76)
Performance/W
T6400
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
116 points/W
119 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
244 points/W
107 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96 points/W
106 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
488 points/W
369 points/W
Performance/GHz
T6400
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
1128 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2491 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
944 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
478 points/GHz
692 points/GHz
TOTAL
5040 points/GHz
3916 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4