Core 2 Duo T6400 vs E6320
Description
Both models T6400 and E6320 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6400 gets a score of 17.1 k points while the E6320 gets 13.2 k points.
Summarizing, the T6400 is 1.3 times faster than the E6320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6400 gets a score of 17.1 k points while the E6320 gets 13.2 k points.
Summarizing, the T6400 is 1.3 times faster than the E6320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
6f6
Core
Penryn-3M
Conroe
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.86 GHz
Socket
FC-PGA
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2009
April 2007
Mean monothread perf.
10.08k points
8.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.08k points
13.19k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
T6400
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
1.76k
1.86k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
4.63k
1.87k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
1.83k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1k
1.81k (x1.82)
TOTAL
9.24k
7.37k (x0.8)
Multithread
T6400
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
3.21k
3.68k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
8.75k
3.69k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
3.6k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
1.06k (x0.93)
TOTAL
16.58k
12.03k (x0.73)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T6400
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
2.26k
2.16k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
4.98k
1.94k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.89k
1.94k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.96k
2.2k (x2.3)
TOTAL
10.08k
8.24k (x0.82)
Multithread
T6400
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
4.06k
4.28k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
3.82k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.38k
3.84k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.11k
1.25k (x1.12)
TOTAL
17.08k
13.19k (x0.77)
Performance/W
T6400
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
116 points/W
66 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
244 points/W
59 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96 points/W
59 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
19 points/W
TOTAL
488 points/W
203 points/W
Performance/GHz
T6400
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
1128 points/GHz
1162 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2491 points/GHz
1041 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
944 points/GHz
1045 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
478 points/GHz
1183 points/GHz
TOTAL
5040 points/GHz
4431 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4