Core 2 Duo T6400 vs Core i3-370M
Description
The T6400 is based on Core architecture while the i3-370M is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6400 gets a score of 17.1 k points while the i3-370M gets 18.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-370M is 1.1 times faster than the T6400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6400 gets a score of 17.1 k points while the i3-370M gets 18.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-370M is 1.1 times faster than the T6400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
20655
Core
Penryn-3M
Arrandale
Base frecuency
2 GHz
0.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
FC-PGA
Socket G1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2009
Mean monothread perf.
10.08k points
8.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.08k points
18.15k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T6400
i3-370M
Test#1 (Integers)
2.26k
3.4k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
4.98k
2.35k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.89k
1.35k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.96k
1.39k (x1.46)
TOTAL
10.08k
8.49k (x0.84)
Multithread
T6400
i3-370M
Test#1 (Integers)
4.06k
7.18k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
5.13k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.38k
3.5k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.11k
2.33k (x2.09)
TOTAL
17.08k
18.15k (x1.06)
Performance/W
T6400
i3-370M
Test#1 (Integers)
116 points/W
205 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
244 points/W
147 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96 points/W
100 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
67 points/W
TOTAL
488 points/W
518 points/W
Performance/GHz
T6400
i3-370M
Test#1 (Integers)
1128 points/GHz
1419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2491 points/GHz
978 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
944 points/GHz
561 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
478 points/GHz
580 points/GHz
TOTAL
5040 points/GHz
3537 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4