| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo T6400 vs Celeron N3150


Description
The T6400 is based on Core architecture while the N3150 is based on Airmont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6400 gets a score of 17.1 k points while the N3150 gets 31.8 k points.

Summarizing, the N3150 is 1.9 times faster than the T6400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
406c3
Core
Penryn-3M
Braswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
2.08 GHz
Socket
FC-PGA
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
January 2009
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
10.08k points
9.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.08k points
31.8k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
T6400
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
1.76k
1.07k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
4.63k
1.74k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
1.5k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
1k
1.46k (x1.46)
TOTAL
9.24k
5.78k (x0.62)

Multithread

T6400

N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
3.21k
3.99k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
8.75k
6.31k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
5.05k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
2.65k (x2.32)
TOTAL
16.58k
18k (x1.09)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T6400
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
2.26k
3.91k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
4.98k
2.29k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.89k
1.57k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.96k
1.44k (x1.51)
TOTAL
10.08k
9.21k (x0.91)

Multithread

T6400

N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
4.06k
14.78k (x3.64)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
8.62k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.38k
5.84k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.11k
2.57k (x2.3)
TOTAL
17.08k
31.8k (x1.86)

Performance/W
T6400
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
116 points/W
2463 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
244 points/W
1437 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96 points/W
973 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
428 points/W
TOTAL
488 points/W
5300 points/W

Performance/GHz
T6400
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
1128 points/GHz
1880 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2491 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
944 points/GHz
755 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
478 points/GHz
692 points/GHz
TOTAL
5040 points/GHz
4429 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4