| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo T6400 vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The T6400 is based on Core architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T6400 gets a score of 17.1 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 4.7 times faster than the T6400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
100fa0
Core
Penryn-3M
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
FC-PGA
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/6
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2048 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2009
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
10.08k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
17.08k points
80.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
T6400
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1.76k
1.98k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
4.63k
4.57k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.86k
2.57k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
1k
3.51k (x3.52)
TOTAL
9.24k
12.64k (x1.37)

Multithread

T6400

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.21k
11.86k (x3.7)
Test#2 (FP)
8.75k
27.4k (x3.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.47k
15.39k (x4.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
3.46k (x3.02)
TOTAL
16.58k
58.11k (x3.51)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T6400
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.26k
5.17k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
4.98k
5.33k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.89k
2.76k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.96k
3.51k (x3.68)
TOTAL
10.08k
16.77k (x1.66)

Multithread

T6400

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.06k
29.82k (x7.34)
Test#2 (FP)
8.53k
30.79k (x3.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.38k
15.88k (x4.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.11k
3.69k (x3.31)
TOTAL
17.08k
80.19k (x4.69)

Performance/W
T6400
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
116 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
244 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
488 points/W
844 points/W

Performance/GHz
T6400
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1128 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2491 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
944 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
478 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
5040 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4