Core 2 Duo P8400 vs Pentium Dual-Core T4500
Description
Both models P8400 and T4500 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P8400 gets a score of 21 k points while the T4500 gets 23 k points.
Summarizing, the T4500 is 1.1 times faster than the P8400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P8400 gets a score of 21 k points while the T4500 gets 23 k points.
Summarizing, the T4500 is 1.1 times faster than the P8400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
1067a
Core
Peryn-3M
Penryn-3M
Base frecuency
2.267 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
Socket P
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
25 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
1024 kB
Date
July 2008
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
11.38k points
12.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
21.02k points
23.03k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
P8400
T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
1.78k
2.11k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
4.95k
5.4k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.08k
2.27k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
1.22k (x0.85)
TOTAL
10.24k
10.99k (x1.07)
Multithread
P8400
T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
3.53k
4.2k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
9.75k
10.75k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.07k
4.53k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
1.34k (x0.93)
TOTAL
18.79k
20.83k (x1.11)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
P8400
T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
2.43k
2.63k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
5.4k
5.88k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.13k
2.36k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.43k
1.19k (x0.83)
TOTAL
11.38k
12.07k (x1.06)
Multithread
P8400
T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.81k
5.27k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
10.58k
11.69k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.18k
4.73k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
1.35k (x0.93)
TOTAL
21.02k
23.03k (x1.1)
Performance/W
P8400
T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
193 points/W
150 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
423 points/W
334 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
135 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
38 points/W
TOTAL
841 points/W
658 points/W
Performance/GHz
P8400
T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
1071 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2383 points/GHz
2558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
938 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
629 points/GHz
516 points/GHz
TOTAL
5022 points/GHz
5246 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4