Core 2 Duo P8400 vs Celeron J4105
Description
The P8400 is based on Core architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P8400 gets a score of 21 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 2.9 times faster than the P8400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the P8400 gets a score of 21 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 2.9 times faster than the P8400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
10676
706a1
Core
Peryn-3M
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.267 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.267 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket P
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
25 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2008
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
11.38k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
21.02k points
61.49k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
P8400
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
1.78k
1.68k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
4.95k
5.29k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.08k
2.75k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
3.44k (x2.39)
TOTAL
10.24k
13.16k (x1.29)
Multithread
P8400
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
3.53k
6.39k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
9.75k
20.02k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.07k
10.22k (x2.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.44k
4.94k (x3.43)
TOTAL
18.79k
41.57k (x2.21)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
P8400
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2.43k
4.9k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
5.4k
7.26k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.13k
2.75k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.43k
3.32k (x2.33)
TOTAL
11.38k
18.22k (x1.6)
Multithread
P8400
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
4.81k
18.84k (x3.91)
Test#2 (FP)
10.58k
27.45k (x2.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.18k
10.35k (x2.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.45k
4.85k (x3.35)
TOTAL
21.02k
61.49k (x2.93)
Performance/W
P8400
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
193 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
423 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
167 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
841 points/W
6149 points/W
Performance/GHz
P8400
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
1071 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2383 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
938 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
629 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
5022 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4