Core 2 Duo E8500 vs E8200
Description
Both models E8500 and E8200 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8500 gets a score of 31.2 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E8500 is 1.2 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8500 gets a score of 31.2 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the E8500 is 1.2 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
10676
Core
Wolfdale
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
3.167 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6144 kB
6144 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
August 2008
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
19.46k points
15.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.21k points
25.39k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E8500
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
3.65k
3k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
8.07k
6.62k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
2.55k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.59k
3.6k (x0.78)
TOTAL
19.46k
15.77k (x0.81)
Multithread
E8500
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
7.11k
5.83k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
15.79k
12.64k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.2k
4.97k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.13k
1.95k (x0.92)
TOTAL
31.21k
25.39k (x0.81)
Performance/W
E8500
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
109 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
243 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
95 points/W
76 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
480 points/W
391 points/W
Performance/GHz
E8500
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
1151 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/GHz
2481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1450 points/GHz
1349 points/GHz
TOTAL
6144 points/GHz
5912 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4