| | | | | | |

Core 2 Duo E8500 vs Core i5-M 540


Description
The E8500 is based on Core architecture while the i5-M 540 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8500 gets a score of 31.2 k points while the i5-M 540 gets 29.5 k points.

Summarizing, the E8500 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-M 540. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
1067a
20652
Core
Wolfdale
Arrandale
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.167 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.167 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
FC-PGA10
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6144 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2008
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
19.46k points
15.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.21k points
29.54k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E8500
i5-M 540
Test#1 (Integers)
3.65k
6.7k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
8.07k
4.54k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
2.48k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.59k
1.32k (x0.29)
TOTAL
19.46k
15.05k (x0.77)

Multithread

E8500

i5-M 540
Test#1 (Integers)
7.11k
12.27k (x1.73)
Test#2 (FP)
15.79k
9.7k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.2k
5.97k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.13k
1.59k (x0.75)
TOTAL
31.21k
29.54k (x0.95)

Performance/W
E8500
i5-M 540
Test#1 (Integers)
109 points/W
351 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
243 points/W
277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
95 points/W
171 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
480 points/W
844 points/W

Performance/GHz
E8500
i5-M 540
Test#1 (Integers)
1151 points/GHz
2394 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/GHz
1622 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
885 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1450 points/GHz
473 points/GHz
TOTAL
6144 points/GHz
5373 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4