Core 2 Duo E8500 vs Core i7-7020U
Description
The E8500 is based on Core architecture while the i7-7020U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8500 gets a score of 31.2 k points while the i7-7020U gets 57.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7020U is 1.8 times faster than the E8500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8500 gets a score of 31.2 k points while the i7-7020U gets 57.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7020U is 1.8 times faster than the E8500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
806ea
Core
Wolfdale
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.167 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6144 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2008
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
19.46k points
33.63k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.21k points
73.15k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E8500
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.65k
8.18k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
8.07k
11.67k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
2.97k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.59k
4.68k (x1.02)
TOTAL
19.46k
27.5k (x1.41)
Multithread
E8500
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.11k
17.51k (x2.46)
Test#2 (FP)
15.79k
27.61k (x1.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.2k
7.39k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.13k
4.78k (x2.25)
TOTAL
31.21k
57.3k (x1.84)
Performance/W
E8500
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
109 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
243 points/W
1841 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
95 points/W
493 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
319 points/W
TOTAL
480 points/W
3820 points/W
Performance/GHz
E8500
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
1151 points/GHz
3555 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/GHz
5073 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1293 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1450 points/GHz
2034 points/GHz
TOTAL
6144 points/GHz
11956 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4