Core 2 Duo E8500 vs Core i3-6006U
Description
The E8500 is based on Core architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8500 gets a score of 31.2 k points while the i3-6006U gets 47.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.5 times faster than the E8500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8500 gets a score of 31.2 k points while the i3-6006U gets 47.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6006U is 1.5 times faster than the E8500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
406e3
Core
Wolfdale
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
3.167 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6144 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2008
November 2016
Mean monothread perf.
19.46k points
30.66k points
Mean multithread perf.
31.21k points
67.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E8500
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.65k
7.28k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
8.07k
10.51k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.15k
2.81k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.59k
2.88k (x0.63)
TOTAL
19.46k
23.48k (x1.21)
Multithread
E8500
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.11k
14.98k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
15.79k
23.68k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.2k
6.37k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.13k
2.43k (x1.15)
TOTAL
31.21k
47.46k (x1.52)
Performance/W
E8500
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
109 points/W
998 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
243 points/W
1579 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
95 points/W
425 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
33 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
480 points/W
3164 points/W
Performance/GHz
E8500
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
1151 points/GHz
3640 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/GHz
5255 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1450 points/GHz
1441 points/GHz
TOTAL
6144 points/GHz
11739 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4