Core 2 Duo E8400 vs Celeron J3455
Description
The E8400 is based on Core architecture while the J3455 is based on Goldmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8400 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the J3455 gets 47.3 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.7 times faster than the E8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E8400 gets a score of 27.1 k points while the J3455 gets 47.3 k points.
Summarizing, the J3455 is 1.7 times faster than the E8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
1067a
506c9
Core
Wolfdale
Apollo Lake
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
65 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
6144 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
January 2008
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
17.28k points
12.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
27.11k points
47.34k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E8400
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
3.3k
6.02k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
7.28k
3.49k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.88k
2.01k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.83k
1.47k (x0.38)
TOTAL
17.28k
12.98k (x0.75)
Multithread
E8400
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
6.3k
23.7k (x3.76)
Test#2 (FP)
13.71k
13.75k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.32k
7.8k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
2.09k (x1.17)
TOTAL
27.11k
47.34k (x1.75)
Performance/W
E8400
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
97 points/W
2370 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
211 points/W
1375 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
82 points/W
780 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
27 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
417 points/W
4734 points/W
Performance/GHz
E8400
J3455
Test#1 (Integers)
1099 points/GHz
2619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2426 points/GHz
1517 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
959 points/GHz
872 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1278 points/GHz
637 points/GHz
TOTAL
5762 points/GHz
5645 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4